The Shift Towards De-Dollarization and the Coming Collapse of the American Empire

Introduction:

In a recent interview with TV host Brannon Howse, economist and attorney Rebecca Walser discussed President Donald Trump’s warning about the economy and the potential crash of the American dollar. Walser highlighted the global macro shifts and the de-dollarization process that the public may not be fully aware of due to limited coverage in mainstream news channels. This article delves into the key points discussed during the interview and sheds light on the warning signs of economic instability.

The Shift Towards De-Dollarization:

President Trump’s speech emphasized the growing coalition between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, which poses a menacing threat to the United States. Walser acknowledged that this merging of nations is an unexpected development, as Russia and China are traditionally considered natural enemies. She attributed this shift to the actions of Joe Biden and even mentioned Obama’s role in bringing them together. The de-dollarization process was identified as a significant concern, as the potential loss of the U.S. dollar as the world’s standard currency could have severe consequences, leading the country down the path of a third-world nation.

Lack of Mainstream Coverage:

Walser expressed her appreciation for alternative channels like the one hosting the interview, as they provide a platform for discussing crucial topics often neglected by mainstream news outlets. She highlighted the censorship faced by President Trump and others, which hinders the dissemination of vital information to the general public. The interview aimed to bridge this information gap and shed light on the broader economic trends affecting the world.

Warning Signs of Economic Instability:

Building upon her previous warnings, Walser discussed the stress tests conducted on the largest banks, revealing that even in adverse scenarios, they would miraculously remain solvent. This disconnection between the reality of economic instability and government regulations is a cause for concern. Walser expressed her worry about the potential implementation of a blanket bail-in strategy, where access to funds could be frozen, significantly impacting individuals’ financial security. She referenced measures already observed in the United Kingdom, where banks are denying cash withdrawals without proper documentation, signaling a shift towards strict control over funds.

Implications for Investors:

Walser urged individuals to be vigilant and informed about institutional money movements, as they play a significant role in shaping the market. She highlighted the largest short position taken against the S&P 500 by institutional investors, totaling $1 trillion since April 2022. This bearish sentiment should serve as a warning for retail investors not to be swayed by the fear of missing out and to consider leveraging and strategizing based on institutional activities. As liquidity dries up and the M2 money supply contracts, the economy becomes increasingly vulnerable, potentially leading to a grinding halt if consumption and stimulus decline.

The Impending Crisis: Capital Controls and the Fragility of the Financial System

In a recent interview, TV host Brannon Howse and lawyer/economist Rebecca Walser discussed the concerning state of the financial system and the potential implementation of capital controls. Howse, who has been warning his audience about this issue for over a decade, expressed his fears about the limitations on individuals’ freedom to access and move their own assets. Walser echoed these concerns and highlighted the need for tangible assets during times of economic uncertainty. The interview shed light on the growing risks within the banking sector and the potential consequences for individuals and society as a whole.

The Threat of Capital Controls:

Howse stressed the importance of being prepared for capital controls, which restrict the free movement of money and assets. He referred to the measures implemented during the 2008 financial crisis and warned that similar actions could be taken in the future to prevent bank runs and preserve the stability of financial institutions. Howse emphasized that individuals should not assume complete ownership of their funds in banks, as they are essentially handing over their money and becoming uninsured creditors.

The Value of Tangible Assets:

Walser emphasized the need for diversifying investments into hard, tangible assets such as land, real estate, gold, and silver. She argued that during times of currency transitions and financial uncertainty, these assets retain inherent value and can protect individuals from counterparty risks associated with financial derivatives. Walser urged people to move away from investments dependent on third-party obligations and instead focus on assets that have historically weathered economic transitions successfully.

The Coming Currency Change and Financial Instability:

Walser pointed out that a currency change is looming, whether through blockchain, cryptocurrencies, or central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). She emphasized the need to prepare for this transition and highlighted the potential risks associated with financial derivatives tied to third parties. As the economy and commercial real estate values decline, regional banks heavily invested in these areas may face substantial losses. Additionally, interest rate hikes can lead to bank runs as individuals seek higher-yield short-term investments, further destabilizing the financial system.

The Need for Public Awareness and Preparedness:

Howse and Walser both underscored the importance of public awareness regarding the fragility of the financial system. They argued that many people are falsely reassured by the propaganda of Wall Street, believing that everything is fine. However, they emphasized the need to read between the lines and recognize the signs of an impending crisis. They cautioned against prematurely withdrawing funds from banks, as it could accelerate the collapse before the system is prepared for it.

Government Involvement and Corporate Fascism:

The conversation also touched on the issue of government intervention and its collaboration with corporations to enforce regulations and control individual actions. Walser cited examples of censorship and blacklisting, highlighting the danger of government-mandated databases that allow financial institutions to track and restrict individuals based on their beliefs and actions. They expressed concerns over the erosion of individual freedoms and the consolidation of power within the banking sector.